Search for: "State v. Cheeks" Results 341 - 360 of 434
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2017, 8:04 am by Joy Waltemath
Granting the employee’s request for publication of its November 9, 2016 order, and recalling a December 2, 2016 mandate, the Ninth Circuit reversed the grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants and remanded for a trial on the merits of the employee’s federal and state sexual harassment claims and her state claim of failing to prevent sexual harassment (Zetwick v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 2:21 am
For example, in his account of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 11:21 am by David
  In Animal Legal Defense Fund v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Legal Cheek has some interesting examples in its awards for the best use of social media by lawyers. [read post]
13 May 2020, 9:02 pm by Guest Contributor
Essentially, this tongue-in-cheek line can be interpreted as saying we don’t tolerate dishonest people who want to “rent” pigs. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
 There was a short profile on Legal Cheek and a news item in the Jewish Chronicle. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:51 pm by Thomas McDow
Lawyers have traditionally represented indigent criminal defendants pro bono but much of that duty has been absorbed by The State in the aftermath of Gideon v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 9:13 am by Kashmir Hill
ACLU says California DNA law violates privacy [San Francisco Chronicle] Haskell v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:22 pm by Charon QC
  [Part I is here and below] Obiter J considers: Prayers at Council meetings … RollonFriday.com and Legal Cheek picked up on the ‘spit roasting’ attitudes  of a Shearman trainee whose email went viral. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am by Charon QC
Jaguar Shoes v Jaguar Cars: Blame It On The Lawyers! [read post]