Search for: "State v. David W." Results 341 - 360 of 1,802
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
The Egilman Challenge There was a challenge to the testimony of another expert witness, David Egilman, a frequent testifier for Mark Lanier and other lawsuit industrialists. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
In a recent NBER report by David Altig et. al., researchers found that by earning an extra $1,000, one in four of the poorest households, regardless of age, gives half to two-thirds of their paycheck to the government in taxes due to marginal net tax rates above 70 percent on earned income.[1] This has significant implications for work incentives and tax credit eligibility if filers combine their incomes and continue working. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The DACA decision was written by Chief Justice John Roberts, an appointee of former President George W. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 6:57 am by David Post
[UPDATE 6-20-20 4:15 PM EDT:  Several readers have called my attention to the 10th Circuit case of US v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The case provides some Supreme Court guidance on section 4, largely endorsing the decision in Alexander Economou v David de Freitas [2018] EWCA Civ 2591, whilst adding some refinement on the legal analysis provided therein. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac… [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am by Marty Lederman
Circuit case, on behalf of Professors Walter Dellinger, Bill Eskridge and David Strauss, arguing that the House lacks standing to sue on such an Appropriations Clause claim. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary on Vance comes from David Boyle at Boyle’s Laws. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:58 am by Henning Lahmann
In the 1927 Factory at Chorzów case, the Permanent Court of International Justice asserted that a state must “wipe out all the consequences of the illegal act and reestablish the situation which would, in all probability, have existed if that act had not been committed. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Former LHB Guest Blogger Mary Ziegler, Florida State University, has published Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 2:04 pm by Comunicaciones_MJ
… Madison, going beyond the recommendations of the states and the constitution of his own state, phrased his own proposal to make it coextensive with the broadest practice.[3] Los originalistas pretendieron que el derecho a no incriminarse ostentara la misma importancia que otros derechos fundamentales consagrados en la Constitución. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:56 pm by Unknown
  The Legislature sought guidance from the Colorado Supreme Court, asking:[W]hether language in article V, section 7 of the Colorado Constitution limiting the length of the regular legislative session to “one hundred twenty calendar days” requires that those days be counted consecutively, or whether the legislature may, during the exceptional circumstance of a public health disaster emergency, count only “working calendar days” toward the 120-day… [read post]