Search for: "With v. General Elec. Co."
Results 341 - 360
of 484
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2012, 12:37 pm
Lincoln Elec. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
Elec. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 10:03 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 10:38 am
”); Atlas Powder Co. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 11:22 am
Elec. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 1:52 pm
Cir. 2008) [2] American Seating Co. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 3:13 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 8:07 am
Elec., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Searle & Co., 630 F. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
Rather, the calculation of damages necessarily requires speculation regarding what price the parties would have negotiated if the data had been disclosed.[20] The Government has the burden to show “by some reasonable method” the amount it believes the final contract price was overstated.[21] There is a rebuttable presumption that the “natural and probable consequence” of defective cost or pricing data is a “dollar for dollar” increase in the contract price.[22]… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:26 pm
South Carolina Elec. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 5:22 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 3:15 pm
For this reason, Globe Newspaper Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am
The parties to the Agreement were General Yellow Pages Consultants, Inc. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 12:51 pm
Co., 252 A.3d 445, 453-66 (Del. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
This article addresses the applicability of the FAR Cost Principles and their general criteria for determining the allowability of costs. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 11:15 am
Elec. [read post]
5 May 2009, 5:00 am
Texas Elec. [read post]
