Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2011, 11:30 am
By Don T. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 11:41 am
In my opinion, there are abusers on both sides of the “v” in litigation. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 3:15 am
” https://t.co/zsr0SHCcLZ 2019-01-01 RT @neilturkewitz: @richardcowens Here’s of my all-time favorites from EFF: “we aren't arguing for platform safe harbors for the benefit of… 2019-01-01 Computer and Internet Updates for 2019-01-01 https://t.co/HQeMgBHNFh 2019-01-02 Computer and Internet Updates for 2019-01-01 https://t.co/y8a2zRPOnI 2019-01-02 India backed the world's first code of conduct in the digital sphere https://t.co/vsJU6flUU8 2019-01-02… [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:28 am
DPF v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 9:52 am
, Palm Bay Imports, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 7:46 am
Don’t let the firm get too complacent in its practices. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:59 pm
Regarding conditional federal grants, in 1987 in South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 1:08 am
Don’t you believe it... [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:58 pm
” The Court won’t be settling that issue in the case of Horne v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:58 am
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 5:01 pm
Spitzer scandal, is standing up for his client’s rights. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 6:13 am
[Note: I'd also suggest watching (if you haven't already) "Web 2.0 . . . [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 1:02 pm
As an aside, Trevor referred to the Consumer Protection Bill and mentioned that the reference to "electronic transactions" suggests that the Consumer Protection Bill applies to website terms and conditions as falling under the rubric of an "electronic transaction" and introduces a series of requirements that he argues would mitigate against a 23 page legal document in favour of something much simpler. [read post]
25 May 2022, 3:26 pm
"[T]there is a real difference between laws directed at conduct sweeping up incidental speech on the one hand and laws that directly regulate speech on the other. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
There's also a neat Current Intelligence note by the perceptive Enrico Bonadio (City Law School, London) on the Advocate General's Opinion on what counts as "communication to the public" in the joined cases of Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure, YouTube and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08), which the Court of Justice is going to decide this summer. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 7:56 am
’” In Labrador v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am
Sir Nicholas Wall, President of the Family Division of the High Court, “called for a debate on the level of access the media have to hearings held by the Court of Protection, followed by new legislation”, reports PA Media Lawyer. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am
The CAFC-noted exceptions don't apply. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 1:00 pm
Consumers have choices. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm
The first half of 2013 was surfeit with reports of debt and equity transactions of all sizes within the medical device space, a few of which are detailed below: · Valeritas — the maker of the V-Go insulin delivery device — secured debt financing from Capital Royalty LP in the amount of $100 million to fund commercialization of the V-Go. [read post]
