Search for: "UNITED STATES v. FLORIDA"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 6,508
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2013, 6:01 am
UBS Puerto Rico Fixed Income Fund V, Inc. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
UBS Puerto Rico Fixed Income Fund V, Inc. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 5:59 am
UBS Puerto Rico Fixed Income Fund V, Inc. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 5:58 am
UBS Puerto Rico Fixed Income Fund V, Inc. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:39 pm
For example, Lee cites Justice Grier's dissent in O'Reilly v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 9:02 am
The United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida last week filed its Response to the Claimant's Motion to Dismiss in the case involving forfeiture of Peruvian artifacts seized at Miami International Airport. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 6:22 pm
McCracken v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm
Interestingly, however, in addition to citing Russell, in its decision last week, the court also cited United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 8:53 am
Interestingly, however, in addition to citing Russell, in its decision last week, the court also cited United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:50 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:59 pm
Background Of The Case The Florida case, entitled Love v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:42 am
But a few things interested me on today’s list: – A grant in United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:38 pm
United States, 483 U.S. 107 (1987). [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
Since the United States Supreme Court recognized agency amicus interpretations as a source of controlling law entitled to deference in Auer v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:39 am
Last month, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, issued a decision in the case of Seybold v. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 7:58 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Yesterday I attended a Samsung v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 2:52 pm
State of Florida (SC12-1223) and Henry v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 7:08 am
(collectively “Lenco”) appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida holding (1) that vari- ous products sold by Lenco infringed a patent owned by Plaintiff-Cross Appellant Bennett Marine, Inc. [read post]
