Search for: "John Does, 1-2"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 10,070
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2017, 4:49 pm
The latest issue of the Business and Human Rights Journal (Vol. 2, no. 1, January 2017) is out. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm
” Canada In the case of John v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
Instead, although no contemporaneous explanation was documented, the DRBA now offers the non-discriminatory explanations that (1) the comments accompanying the rankings justified its hiring decisions; and (2) its hiring of lower-ranked applicants was necessary to promote diversity in its workforce. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
Section 171(1) was a common form section like CCA section 61(2). [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 7:24 am
Alternatively, does 18 USC 2 (accomplice liability) apply to an effort to assist in the tort violation that provides the felony enhancement? [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:24 am
As to the sales, advertising, and other evidence, [t]his evidence does not establish “the effectiveness of such use to cause the purchasing public to identify the mark with the source of the product.'"And so the Board affirmed the refusal under Section 2(e)(1).Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: One applicant was hit with the "highly descriptive" tag, it was all over.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 11:18 am
When the 90-day review contemplated by the executive order runs its course in September, does the president leave well enough alone (which might moot the case before the Supreme Court hears argument), or does he issue another executive order seeking to extend the “temporary pause” on entry from the six designated countries, which would certainly give the justices something to decide? [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:40 am
Holder: “(1) whether the stay applicant has made a strong showing that he is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) whether the applicant will be irreparably injured absent a stay; (3) whether issuance of the stay will substantially injure the other parties interested in the proceeding; and (4) where the public interest lies. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:39 am
Apply for the John R. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:59 am
Consider the following: 1. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am
Here is John’s guest post. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:54 pm
Some of the points that especially struck me on a first reading:1. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:00 am
Robinson, 496 A.2d 1067, 1069 n.2 (Me. 1985) (emphasis in original). [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 3:00 pm
John Doe, where fruits and contraband of John Doe's crime may be forfeited to the government after conviction, including any illegal money derived from the proceeds.Cuneiform tablet seized by U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 10:04 pm
John Fund, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:44 am
Let me respond to his main points, although briefly. 1. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 10:21 am
Tarry’s third example is a study conducted under the leadership of the late Joseph Gitlin, at Johns Hopkins Medical School. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 12:21 pm
Those differences can be reduced (in this case at least) to two fundamental issues: (1) the way that facts are weighed and balanced; (2) the basic assumptions about the role of the investor in the face of norms that must be enforced. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 4:18 am
And the certification mark TEQUILA cleared the opposition hurdle.Section 2(a) - Deceptiveness:Precedential No. 8: TTAB Finds KLEER ADHESIVES Deceptive, But Not KLEER MOULDINGS and KLEER TRIMBOARDSection 2(b) - Flag, Coat of Arms, or Other Insignia:Precedential No. 7: TTAB Affirms Section 2(b) Refusal of Mark Simulating the Prince of Wales EmblemPrecedential No. 3 = TTAB Test: Does this Mark Include a Simulation of the Swiss Flag? [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 3:44 am
How does she calm her husband down? [read post]
