Search for: "People v J."
Results 3601 - 3620
of 7,244
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2015, 7:06 pm
Fresenius USA, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:42 am
Supreme Court’s 1999 ruling in Cleveland v. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 2:36 pm
See A and B v Rotherham MBC [2014] EWFC 47 Fam. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 1:52 am
It held that for this purpose it is not sufficient that people resident in the jurisdiction may be customers of the claimant when they go abroad, although it could be enough if people in the jurisdiction obtain the right to receive a claimant’s services abroad by booking with, or purchasing from, an entity in this country, even if that entity is not part of the claimant. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 12:10 pm
By Laura J. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:05 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a ruling in the case of People of the State of California and the City of San Diego v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
Anyway this, Alberto's 56th weekly summary, reads as follows:* Green J quashes UK private copying regulationsA few weeks ago Green J issued a judgment concerning the recently-introduced UK exception for personal copies for private use, concluding that it does not currently envisage a fair compensation requirement [here]. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 4:23 pm
The case of ZYT and another v Associated Newspapers Ltd ([2015] EWHC 1162 (QB)) was (what is now) a comparatively rare example of an injunction being sought and granted in a privacy claim against a newspaper. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:32 am
People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Second, in Oncale v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 11:26 am
” Id. at 160 (Scalia, J. concurring). [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
In November 2000, the High Court (Laws LJ and Gibbs J) gave judgment in favour of Mr Bancoult, a Chagos Islander, in granting a High Court order quashing the Immigration Ordinance 1971, s 4; see R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2001] QB 1067 (“Bancoult (1)”). [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:20 am
Recall from December 2007: J. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 9:36 am
Russell v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 1:09 am
Here Green J tries to balance the interest of the music industry versus the fact that maybe millions of people lawfully copied their own media wittingly or unwittingly. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:39 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
After the Court of Appeal reversed the first instance decision of Mr Justice Birss, the very same Darren further reflects on it: wasn’t Birss J basically right? [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm
On the same day Warby J will hear an assessment of damages in the case of Sloutsker v R [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 3:26 am
The same day Mr Starr applied for an interim injunction which was granted by Cox J but discharged by Tugendhat J the following day. [read post]
