Search for: "Sellers v. State" Results 3601 - 3620 of 3,989
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2009, 12:32 am
Chung highlights Justice Field's dissent in Juilliard v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Jason M. Halper
In a bench ruling in the case, City of Miami General Employees’ & Sanitation Employees’ Retirement Trust v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:04 am by Peter Mahler
’ Under the shareholders agreement, the seller of stock in [the company] remains the owner until the note is fully paid. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 5:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
” This rule was developed and applied by the Second Circuit in its 2022 decision in Menora Mivtachim Insurance Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
The notice stated that Lard-PT either could purchase Kolmar’s 51% interest for approximately $10.4 million or it could sell its 49% interest to Kolmar for $10 million. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 3:18 am by Peter Mahler
In other words, it’s intended to avoid rather than foster disagreement and litigation between buyer and seller. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:00 am by WSLL
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name:  Vogel, Administrator of the Wyoming Uniform Consumer Credit Code (WUCCC), v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 4:55 am
Darren reviewed the issues of comparative advertising and obtaining unfair advantage through the use by a smell-alike perfume seller of the brand name of the famous perfume the scent of which was emulated by that smell-alike product -- the subject of the European Court of Justice ruling in Case C-487/07 L'Oreal v Bellure, excoriated by the referring court here. [read post]