Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 9,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2013, 5:18 am
State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm
The latest SSRN Indigenous Nations & Peoples Law e-Journal includes the following: The Substantial Burden Mountain: Implications of the United States Supreme Court’s Denial of Certiorari in Navajo Nation v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:46 pm
” Morrow v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm
Not necessarily.Rumors have been circulating that the new EO will apply the same criteria as EO 13769 but expressly exempt green card holders, student visa holders, and other people with substantial contacts with the United States. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 6:44 am
A 2015, United States District Court, Austin Division, case is a good place to start for grasping the requirements. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am
Overview of Taxes on Tangible Personal Property In the United States, levies on personal property emerged in tandem with taxes on real property. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 3:00 am
United States Sentencing Commission as “suggest[ing] that habeas might not even be available for ‘probabilistic’ claims. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 7:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:45 am
So last Wednesday (March 22, 2017, if you’re joining us late) the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:48 am
United States, __ A.3d __ (D.C. 2012), the D.C. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
The United States Supreme Court, in Phillips Petroleum Co. v Shutts (472 US 797, 810-811 [1985]), succinctly addressed not only the status of an absent class action plaintiff, but also the relative detachment, and concomitant security, that characterizes that plaintiff's involvement in the litigation. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:40 am
And yet, it typically is more difficult to obtain personal jurisdiction over foreign companies in the United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 5:47 am
In Connecticut State Dental v. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
Chamberlin v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:46 pm
In this toxic tort litigation concerning the Pelham Bay landfill, we hold that the reports and findings of the expert epidemiologists and toxicologists satisfy the standard employed in Frye v United States, that of general acceptance in the scientific community. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
"The United States Supreme Court has applied a two-part test to determine whether there was a right of access under the First Amendment [see Press-Enterprise Co. v Superior Ct. of Cal., County of Riverside, 478 US 1, 8-10], and the [New York State] Court of Appeals has used that test to determine whether there is a right of access to a professional disciplinary hearing;4. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
[a] regulatory body ... of ... the United States"—in this case, the FDA. [read post]
