Search for: "STATE v KENNEDY"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 7,329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2008, 11:03 am
Only one medical facility in the state provides abortion services, and Planned Parenthood essentially "imports" those doctors to the state. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 2:41 am
Republican State Comm. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:38 am
The US Supreme Court handed down its decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 2:19 pm
Steve VladeckMuch has been written about Justice Kennedy’s 2003 opinion for the majority in Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:37 am
See Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 5:26 pm
Supreme Court decided (5-4) 14 Penn Plaza v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:31 am
Schempp); the scope of the doctrine of incorporation in state criminal matters (Mapp v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 7:00 am
(Kennedy v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 10:00 pm
In Abrasic 90 Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 9:30 pm
Kennedy on Liberty and Making Minimum Wage: Elsie Parrish v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 3:00 am
A complete discussion in North Carolina would also need to include State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 4:30 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 12:43 pm
 Check the Hertz Corporation v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 11:21 am
United States. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 11:09 am
Justice Kennedy cited a piece by Doug Berman and me in his dissent in Cunningham v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:51 am
At the oral argument earlier this week in McQuiggin v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:20 am
PREPARED BY: Michael Chernicoff Looser Rules on Sentencing Stir Concerns About Equity [online.wsj.com] The Supreme Court cases of The United State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm
As Justice Kennedy explained, when considering whether a defendant can be sued in a particular state, a court must ask itself whether the defendant has done enough business in the state to intend to be governed by that state’s laws. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 11:18 am
In Hill v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
Edward Kennedy that he respected the precedent of Roe v. [read post]
