Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 9,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 5:21 am
Yesterday, a federal district court in New York dismissed the complaint in CREW v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:11 pm
The Children’s Place and was filed in federal court in the District of New Jersey. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am
First, if effective supervision by the courts is the rationale for the duty to give reasons, wouldn’t a duty arise in any case where the underlying decision is subject to judicial review (which, nowadays, is more or less all decisions)? [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 3:59 pm
This important new decision is Creed-21 v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:57 am
First, as the court put it in Vasquez v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am
” Thus the court has upheld compulsory bar dues for lawyers because state bars use dues to administer the admission and discipline system (Keller v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 6:09 am
Also, the Seventh Circuit in Winkler v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 11:30 am
Through the exercise of legal ingenuity and hard work, the lawyers succeeded in exposing the government’s 40-year-old lies and won a U.S. district court order vacating the wartime convictions. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 11:15 am
The government also admitted at oral argument that, in light of the district court’s order, the Department of Health and Human Services does not even need to complete its own self-created internal “best interests” form. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 9:10 am
The case was heard in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, where the presiding judge quickly dubbed the respective parties “Elf On” and “Elf Off. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 7:17 am
Supreme Court precedent before affirming dismissal of his claim with prejudice (Fallon v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:25 am
Oklahoma State Regents). [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:26 pm
In South Carolina State Board of Dentistry v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 4:12 pm
But there’s no judicial review allowed to determine this. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
On Dec. 11, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia heard arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Pildes observes that “[d]eciding to hear the Maryland case is a significant signal that a majority of the Court is not going to hold partisan gerrymandering claims to be non-justiciable (that is, inappropriate for judicial resolution)” in the first partisan-gerrymandering case this term, Gill v. [read post]
