Search for: "Test Plaintiff"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 21,967
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2021, 6:55 am
The court found that plaintiff’s claims failed the reasonable consumer test, which requires a probability that a “significant portion of the general consuming public or of targeted consumers, acting reasonably in the circumstances, could be misled” by the representations. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:50 am
Perhaps knowing that the traditional test requires some adverse employment action, the plaintiff argued that he could satisfy the third element by showing that he faced a Hobson’s choice of compromising his faith and risking discipline or discharge. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 9:05 am
The trial court failed to undertaken a full and proper analysis of the risk utility test for determining whether the product was dangerous per se. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:57 pm
The test for "unconscionability" in Oregon has two parts, one procedural and the other substantive. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 8:01 am
The undisputed evidence will be that there was no medical indication for an anatomic, or structural ultrasound, or other more extensive testing, in this low risk pregnancy. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:36 am
•Tests for independent contractor status. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:02 pm
To calculate attorney fees, the Court of Appeals turned to the test set forth in Smith v Khouri, 481 Mich 519 (2008). [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 1:24 pm
In an effort to test the sufficiency of these claims, Judge Barbier considered the specific claims of a select group of six test plaintiffs, including an offshore diving company, platform drilling rig provider, an offshore equipment salvage company, an offshore oil and gas exploration and production company, a drilling services provider, and an offshore heavy machinery inspection and service company. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 7:39 am
The plaintiffs, Jeanette Scicchitano Smith and Alexander Smith, sued Spectrum Brands, alleging that an aquarium kit, purchased from the defendant, was defective and caused a fire in their home. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 8:48 pm
Following these the Plaintiff’s lawyer brought an application that these doctors deliver “copies of their examining notes or any other recording generated by or on behalf of the said doctors that record any history given to them by the plaintiff on the examination, and any notes that record the doctor's observations or findings on physical examination together with copies of any tests, questionnaires, or other documents completed by… [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 12:00 pm
It is time to "sunset" preference law as we have known it or at least to test its underlying basis empirically . [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
On examination, he reported plaintiff's bizarre overacting and overly dramatic response to testing in support of his conclusion that plaintiff is essentially manufacturing her claims for financial gain. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 8:54 pm
Judge Diaz also held that Plaintiff had "present[ed] a colorable claim as to irreparable harm. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 8:01 am
These theories were never tested, as the plaintiff sought to secure class certification too early, before any discovery had been taken. [read post]
31 May 2021, 5:54 pm
Monsanto later hired a genotoxicologist who found evidence that glyphosate might be genotoxic and recommended that Monsanto conduct tests on Roundup’s genotoxicity. [read post]
5 May 2012, 7:09 pm
The plaintiff-father, however, does not meet the tests for a "zone of danger" claim. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 12:00 pm
Questions: Will the plaintiffs' RICO and state fraud allegations in Spencer v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:05 am
The Court of Appeals has reinstated a disability discrimination suit brought by a wheelchair-bound paraplegic who sued Nanuet Mall over public access violations and wants to return to the mall, in part, to test its compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.The case is Harty v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 11:54 am
The test in determining voluntary assumption of the risk is whether there was an intentional and unreasonable exposure to danger, which the plaintiff either knew or had reason to know. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 9:22 am
Aug. 20, 2019)Stouffer, who (with his coplaintiff production company and his brother, who is not a plaintiff) produced the Wild America nature documentary series, sued National Geographic for trademark infringement, copyright infringement, and unfair competition for its “Wild” productions. [read post]
