Search for: "*doe, Matter of" Results 3681 - 3700 of 140,140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2024, 8:41 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Matter of Azrag, 28 I&N Dec. 784 (BIA 2024) - Where a State court order granting a respondent’s motion to vacate a conviction does not indicate the reason for the vacatur, and there is no other basis in the record to independently establish the reason, the respondent has not satisfied his burden to show that the court vacated his conviction because of a substantive or procedural defect in his criminal proceedings. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 8:00 am by Sasha Volokh
Lorie Smith "offers her speech for pay and does so through . [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
Jackson Women’s Health Organization), does not repudiate Meyer and Pierce so much as complete the recasting of their concerns (together with those of West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:08 am by Mark Burridge
“It helped me in a lot of ways appreciate what people go through and what this whole process does to them. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:49 am by Brian Finucane
The assessment of whether territory is occupied is an objective one and does not rest on the subjective belief of parties to the conflict. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:57 am by wadminw
Even an old phone will not run out in a matter of minutes. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:38 am by Guest Author
  But it is black-letter administrative law that procedural errors only matter if they are prejudicial, and challengers to a rule bear the burden of showing prejudice. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:36 am by Beatrice Yahia
“We will take this matter to the U.N. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
” It does not address the type of “fundamental and ultimate questions having to do with deep and imponderable matters” typically found to accompany a religious belief. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:06 am
Petitioner does not in any way address the issue of descriptiveness of Respondent’s mark in its brief. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by West Coast Environmental Law
It is probably only a matter of time until one or more end up at the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
The Supreme Court has essentially ignored the Press, Assembly, and Petition Clauses, analyzing virtually all First Amendment claims through the lens of the Speech Clause.The second example is one I use all the time to show text does not matter to the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:40 am by jonathanturley
CBS should reconsider this move before it does real harm to itself or its reporters. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 10:18 pm by Ekaterina Kotrikadze
He characterized himself as “a simple Russian academic” who does not cut a heroic figure. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 9:27 pm by Carly Boyd
Professional access does not permit attorneys to send their own messages to the parties. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 9:27 pm by Béligh Elbalti
Pursuant to Article 4 of Law No. 6 of 2015 on Conflict of Laws in Civil and Commercial Matters with Foreign Elements, the parties may choose the applicable law. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Sandy T. Fox
The court refrained from making determinations regarding the conditional nature of the consent or the validity of the agreement, leaving those matters for further consideration during the proceedings. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:51 pm by Parks, Chesin & Walbert
Recently, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals (whose reach encompasses federal matters in Georgia, Florida, and Alabama,) issued a significant decision clarifying exactly how the McDonnell Douglas case’s precedent does — and does not — impact discrimination litigation today. [read post]