Search for: "J True"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 7,749
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2015, 3:50 pm
by Michael J. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 1:55 pm
DiDomenico, J. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 11:00 am
Bibby and Brian J. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 7:09 am
(Cross-posted at Slaw)- Garry J. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 5:42 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Professor J. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 11:19 am
ZELDA JONAS, J. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:33 am
A partir de lo expuesto por Bauman y Lyon, propongo una reflexión sobre los medios sociales en las vidas cotidianas de los jóvenes universitarios. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
"*The court said that because there was no indication that criminal charges are actually being contemplated, Supreme Court properly "reject[ed] [the County’s] claim that because the [g]rand [j]ury proceeding[s] could have resulted in criminal charges against [Mossman ], the proceeding[s] [were] not civil in nature" and that any other holding “would defeat the clear intent of the statute, which insulates public employees from litigation expenses arising out of… [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 9:03 pm
To be sure, there is a brief by a UCLA professor, Gary J. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:18 pm
BALLETTA, J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment insofar as appealed from, with the following memorandum: While it is true that the court is empowered to make decisions concerning the possession of marital property "as justice requires" despite the failure of the underlying divorce action (Domestic Relations Law § 234; Brady v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 6:20 am
J. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:03 am
O’Neal, supra.Before the judge began his analysis of O’Neal’s motion to dismiss, he outlined the essential facts in the case:Because the Court is responding to O'Neal's Motion to Dismiss, the facts alleged in the Complaint . . . are accepted as true and are summarized below. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm
The element that the Defendant knew of the existence of a valid order of protection is established because the complaint recites the statement on the temporary order of protection that the Defendant was present in Richmond County Family Court (DiDomenico, J.) when the order was issued, and received a copy of the order of protection in Court. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 12:40 pm
The Court is not unmindful that this analysis appears to be at odds with the Court of Appeals decision in People v Rodriguez (68 NY2d 674 [1986], revg for reasons stated in dissenting opn of Lazer, J., 113 AD2d 337, 343-348 [2d Dept 1985]). [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:49 pm
, 8 Cardozo Women's L J 171 (2002). [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:44 am
District Court Judge Stephen J. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 11:47 am
MICHAEL J. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 8:57 am
David J. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:25 am
Before the wedding, J. [read post]
