Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 6,183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2012, 1:43 pm
In Federation v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 1:28 pm
In Federation v. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 7:13 pm
This passage was also cited in Hijos v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 10:17 am
The decision is Brown and Brown, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 11:22 am
Then along came Coventry & Ors v Lawrence & Anor (No 2) [2014] UKSC 46 on 23 July. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:21 am
The obligation placed upon the IOPC Director General to have regard to the 2014 Guidance cannot mean that the Director General can disapply the 2012 Regulations or that he should be informed by para 4.4 of the Code of Ethics [104]. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 7:24 pm
I do not believe that the standard of care required of a medical practitioner has been more clearly or succinctly stated than by Lord Hewart C.J. in Rex v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:13 pm
(Barr v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:33 am
§ 112, ¶ 2 (2002). [read post]
4 May 2010, 9:04 pm
The court rejected this reasoning, stating at para 50: “… the present case is not put in a different category by the fact that the Secretary of State is not seeking to subject Mr Tariq to a control order but is simply defending a discrimination claim. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:23 pm
The impact of R. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 7:33 am
See, e.g., Baker v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 1:29 pm
See R. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 2:44 am
R Gandhi (2010) 11 SCC 1 given in the context of setting up of NCLT/NCLAT, and recent judgment of Namit Sharma v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:48 am
The authority cited in support of this proposition is Pozzoli SPA v BDMO [2007] EWCA Civ 588, in which Jacob LJ stated at para 10: "I would add this about permission to appeal in patent cases generally. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 1:11 pm
Because fashion shows were recognized as full-fledged copyright works (‘oeuvres de l’esprit’) under French law by the Civil Supreme Court (Court de Cassation) in 2008 (decision: Ashby v Gaulme, Kenzo et Lacroix (2008) ; Ashby Donald and Others v France [2013] ECHR 28; see here). [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:53 pm
The Prosecutor further emphasized that the concept of being “unwilling” genuinely to investigate is “concerned with a situation in which proceedings are conducted in a manner which would lead to a suspect evading justice as a result of a State not being willing genuinely to investigate or prosecute” (para. 284). [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 11:57 am
Oct. 29, 2018), D.I. 28 ¶;¶ 3, 6, 8, 11-13, 15-16. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 11:41 pm
There'll be a spectacular Epic Games v. [read post]
