Search for: "v. JONES" Results 3761 - 3780 of 9,904
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm by Schachtman
Sander Greenland is one of the few academics, who has served as an expert witness, who has written post-mortems of his involvement in various litigations[1]. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:20 am
Multinational companies must create effective grievance systems for the communities in which they do business, says University of Ottawa law professor Errol Mendes.Lack of access to remedies for local complainants is a “gaping hole” in due diligence by companies doing business overseas, said Mendes, a former United Nations adviser on corporate social responsibility.Mendes, who spoke at the Ontario Bar Association’s annual conference in Toronto yesterday, told lawyers designing… [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
(a)  Hodge Jones & Allen LLP v Times Newspapers Ltd (b)  Brand v NGN (c)  Walliams v NGN. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) Professor James Stewart, of the Faculty of Law at the University of British Columbia, has produced a valuable on line symposium: Business and Human Rights: Next Steps. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:47 am by Jeffrey Vagle
In many cases, this would be true, but consider Justice Sotomayor's warning in her United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:47 am by Jeffrey Vagle
In many cases, this would be true, but consider Justice Sotomayor's warning in her United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:47 am by Jeffrey Vagle
In many cases, this would be true, but consider Justice Sotomayor's warning in her United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:20 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
-- The CAFC noted--We addressed similar circumstances involving thesame conflict rule, albeit from a different jurisdiction, inFreedom Wireless, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 7:24 am by Joy Waltemath
In a SOX whistleblower case by a CFO who was fired after alerting the SEC to financial irregularities, the Fourth Circuit addressed multiple procedural and substantive challenges to significant backpay and compensatory awards against the company, its CEO, and the chairman of the board, concluding that the four-year “catch-all” statute of limitations applied, that emotional distress damages were available under SOX Sec. 1514A, and that there was no abuse of discretion in holding the… [read post]