Search for: "A&J Produce Corp" Results 361 - 380 of 905
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2016, 10:00 pm by Dan Flynn
The injunction also prohibits the company’s former president and owner, Ira J. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:55 am by Schachtman
The guidelines, for instance, call for graphical displays, but in litigation, charts, graphs, and other demonstratives are often not produced until the eve of trial, when case management orders call for the parties to exchange such materials. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:36 pm by MBettman
On January 5, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Ross J. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 10:03 pm by Dan Flynn
Back in the district courts, among the unfinished business is the sentencing of Jesse J. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 5:28 am by Barry Sookman
The Supreme Court released a landmark judgment yesterday in the closely watched case, Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 5:53 am by Barry Sookman
In Metropolitan International Schools Ltd (trading as SkillsTrain and/or Train2Game) v Designtechnica Corp (trading as Digital Trends) and others,[143] Eady J held that Google was not a publisher of such paragraphs before notification or while taking reasonable steps to remove them after notification. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Same was true of Goodyear about personal jurisdiction—J. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am by Schachtman
No serious observer or scholar of the law of evidence can deny that the lower federal courts have applied Daubert and its progeny, and the revised Federal Rule of Evidence 702, inconstantly and inconsistently, in their decisions to admit or exclude proffered expert witness opinion testimony. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Specifically, “[j]udicial independence [in Morocco] is further complicated by the King’s role. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  For example, a U.S. provider that stores data in the United States, from the email account of a British citizen located in England, might be simultaneously required (by DRIPA) and forbidden (by ECPA/SCA) to produce the email.[19]  Correspondingly, a U.S. provider that stores email abroad might be simultaneously required (by the SCA) and forbidden (by a foreign data protection law) to produce the email. [read post]