Search for: "Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure" Results 361 - 380 of 822
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2016, 2:33 pm by Law Lady
Supreme Court of Florida.Florida Bar -- Rules -- Amendment -- Competence -- Minimum continuing legal education standards
IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR 4-1.1 AND 6-10.3. [read post]
” Quoting the Florida Supreme Court, the Iowa Court noted, "It is unreasonable to subject an owner to a 'reasonable care' test against someone who isn't supposed to be there and about whom he does not know. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 2:33 pm by Schachtman
The problem of reliance, as contained within Rule 703, is deep and pervasive in modern civil and criminal trials. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 12:22 pm by Jeremy Saland
Criminal lawyers or not, we can all argue and address the intentions and practical applications of the Second Amendment. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 12:22 pm by Jeremy Saland
Criminal lawyers or not, we can all argue and address the intentions and practical applications of the Second Amendment. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 1:11 pm
 She also claims the coaches pulled her scholarship, but later reinstated it.The university claims it followed all Title IX procedures as required, without giving details. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
One approach would be to say that Miller was a procedural case and therefore did not announce a new rule of substantive constitutional rule. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 2:29 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule is the rule that an item of evidence -- regardless of how reliable it may be and much value it may have in guiding the trier of fact to the truth of the matter to be decided in the criminal case -- must be excluded if it is found that the police violated the complex rules governing search and seizures under that Amendment.The exclusionary rule has no basis in the text of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
The question in this case is whether this rule applies only to first assistants under the default rule, or whether it also applies to the alternative people the president can designate. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
Florida and Atkins v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 3:36 pm by Jacek Stramski
The defendant in this case is challenging the state’s intent to impose the death penalty, arguing that because death penalty procedure in place at the time of his indictment was invalidated, the legislative amendments to the procedure passed subsequently cannot be applied retroactively to his case. [read post]
31 May 2016, 10:12 am by Steven Boutwell
Furthermore, misdemeanor criminal fines may be assessed to the employer for the same failures. [read post]
31 May 2016, 10:12 am by Steven Boutwell
Furthermore, misdemeanor criminal fines may be assessed to the employer for the same failures. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am by John Elwood
Ryan, which allowed certain petitioners who claimed ineffective assistance to excuse procedural defaults. [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:52 pm by David Kopel
Further information about the case, including the firearms models and the various procedures for class members, is available here. [read post]
13 May 2016, 7:55 am
A subsidiary issue that is related to the use of the criminal law as an agent for cultural change involves the way that customary rules of process fairness are bent to the greater policy goals.There are many who view criminalization and the use of law instrumentally, and especially the criminal law, as a valuable tool for societal progress. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:11 am by Amy Howe
Florida, in which the Court “struck down Florida’s unique system of imposing death sentences as unconstitutional because it let judges, rather than juries, make the final call. [read post]