Search for: "BILLINGS v. STATE"
Results 361 - 380
of 21,661
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 5:35 am
In a 1992 case, State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 7 February the Secretary of State promoting the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill, Michelle Donelan, brought a motion in the Commons extending the time before which the Bill will lapse by 280 days to 12 December 2024. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 10:27 pm
Prosecutors speak through indictments: either bill, or no bill. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 8:44 pm
Puntarelli v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
The relevant precedent would be Arizona v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
In the coming months the Supreme Court is set to hear arguments in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
See State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
The case is the most significant elections matter the justices have been forced to confront since the Bush v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 12:51 pm
That is the 1920 case called Eisner v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 10:18 am
Carovillano v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
He suggested that allowing Congress to simply bar political opponents from office would be a form of punishment without due process and would likely violate the prohibition on bills of attainder. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:39 am
Same-Sex Marriages As of right now, Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Bills are pending in a number of states. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Groff v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
The state courts, for example, are not trying to enjoin Donald Trump from taking office. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Also last year, the New York State legislature introduced legislation that would ban non-competes in New York; that bill was recently vetoed. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 9:34 am
She brings this suit along with Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (PPSAT) against the state because of its alleged ambiguous language in Senate Bill 474 (SB 474), also known as the Fetal Heartbeat and Protection from Abortion Act. [read post]