Search for: "Cross v. Superior Court" Results 361 - 380 of 1,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2018, 5:10 am by Michael Risch
Folkens contends that Defendants offered no evidence that the crossing of two dolphins in this way occurs in nature….But the court never gets to these types of questions. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:17 am by Schachtman
Superior Court, No. 16-466, 582 U.S. ___ (June 19, 2017). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The Superior Court of Orange County, --- Cal.Rptr.3d ----, 2011 WL 240278 (Cal.) [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 2:39 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2010), and must take into account the “unchallenged superiority” of a district court’s ability to make witness-credibility determinations and findings of fact, see Salve Regina Coll. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 11:59 am by Francis Pileggi
In a 41-page opinion on cross motions for summary judgment, the Delaware Superior Court held that the new restrictions, while more narrowly-tailored in scope than the blanket restrictions in Bridgeville, were in part both constitutionally and statutorily invalid. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:30 pm by Christopher Bird
Each week, Wise Law Blog will review recent decisions by the Ontario Court of Appeal.Love v. cuity Investment Management Inc. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:32 pm by Lovechilde
Judge Finds Racial Bias In Death Penalty Sentencing By Keith Kamisugi, cross-posted from Equal Justice Society Just days before the 25th anniversary of McCleskey v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am by Eric Goldman
Additionally, the court finds that the alleged attributes and features of Snapchat cross the line into “content” – as the Liapes and Lee courts found, too. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 1:40 pm by Unknown
"Superior Court of San Diego County, Super. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 1:40 pm by Unknown
"Superior Court of San Diego County, Super. [read post]
23 May 2019, 12:31 pm by admin
This case was an appeal from the decision of the Superior Court of Justice, in which the lower court granted summary judgment to the defendants in a beer marketing class action case commenced under the Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 1:17 am by Fathima Cader
First, the court held that, as per Syndicat Northcrest v. [read post]