Search for: "Davidson, Appeal of"
Results 361 - 380
of 678
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2014, 1:24 pm
The Tennessee Court of Appeals upheld that judgment. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 9:06 am
On appeal, Teal argued that punitive damages were not warranted. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 10:53 am
Ellis, 2006 BCSC 1808, and Davidson v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:07 pm
Davidson County Broadcasting, Inc. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 3:26 am
The case is on its way to the Court of Appeals. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 12:09 pm
First, breath alcohol testing is routinely performed in Nashville, Davidson County, Tennessee DUI cases. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 3:47 am
This case started in Davidson County General Sessions Court. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 2:33 pm
The trial judge determined that Brown had proven all elements necessary to recover under quantum meruit and her decision was affirmed on appeal. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 8:30 am
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, No. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:00 am
Appeals are not expected to be considered by the review as they are for wider consideration, not related specifically to corroboration. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 7:03 am
The appeals court affirmed. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 5:57 am
Davidson and Jones, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 11:00 am
Amy Davidson at the New Yorker parses Judge Leon’s opinion as well. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 2:23 pm
In an opinion involving a decision of the Davidson County Probate Court, the Court of Appeals of Tennessee declined to allow a resulting trust to be imposed to undo a son's ownership of an expensive home for which his mother paid almost the entire cost of construction. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:32 am
The parties cross-appealed. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 1:14 pm
Thus, a timely protest is an essential prerequisite for relief under a CPL 330.30 (1) claim of an error of law, unless the error has deprived the defendant of a fundamental right akin to People v Davidson, People v Padro and People v Antommarchi. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:34 am
But see Davidson Supply Co. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:39 pm
In the Ninth Circuit, when the feature also "contributes to the consumer appeal and saleability of the product," the "aesthetic functionality" doctrine "retains some limited viability." [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 7:34 pm
The trial judge's ruling was appealed. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 7:08 am
Harley-Davidson, Inc., 269 F.3d 1360, 1367 (Fed. [read post]
