Search for: "Does 1 - 30" Results 361 - 380 of 28,579
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2011, 5:50 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
What does it feel like when your stuttering. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 4:00 pm
But this also illustrates the problem of trying to apply a weighted average based on ever-shifting class sizes over the last 10 to 30 years. [read post]
22 May 2009, 9:00 am
ALI-ABA is sponsoring a live telephone seminar & live audio Webcast on the "Attorney's Role in LEED Construction" on Friday, Mary 29, 2009 from 12:30 pm to 1:30 pm EDT.Topics include:What is the LEED rating system and what other standards exist? [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 6:27 am
LEXIS 873 (October 30, 2009): Because Hutson and Schlesener's status as public housing employees does not automatically invoke Fourth Amendment protections, we must determine whether they independently entered Brittingham's apartment or whether their entry constituted government action. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 10:47 am
This new law requires: (1) recordation of a trustee’s deed upon sale within 30 days of the sale; and (2) a copy of a recorded trustee’s deed upon sale to be provided to an association within 15 days of the trustee’s sale, provided that the association has recorded the statutorily required request for notice on the subject property pursuant to Section 2924b(f) prior to the recordation of the trustee’s notice of default. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:47 pm by The Complex Litigator
Superior Court, previously mentioned on this blog here, will address the following issues: (1) Does the attorney-client privilege (Evid. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 3:55 am
LEXIS 444 (December 30, 2011).* “FSTs must be supported by reasonable suspicion, that there is no requirement for an officer to advise a minor of a right to withhold consent, and that failure to advise a minor of a right to remain silent does not render FSTs inadmissible. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 8:22 am
Educator appealed and the Appellate Division agreed with her argument that Supreme Court erred in granting DOE’s motion to vacate the court’s initial order, dated May 30, 2006, as it was untimely, having been made more than one year after DOE received actual notice of the order. [read post]