Search for: "In re: F&N Construction, Inc." Results 361 - 380 of 490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2011, 11:57 am
" In re Comiskey, 554 F.3d 967, 980 (Fed. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: WTO report confirms USTR lost on key issue of whether China’s thresholds for criminal IP enforcement are too high (Managing Intellectual Property) (IP Justice) (IP Justice) (China Hearsay) (China Law Blog) US: Judd Gregg to be nominated as Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)… [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Dragon) Patent strategies for foreign R&D work in China (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) All clichés but still true: Intellectual Property Rights enforcement in China leaves room for improvement (IP Dragon) Recognition and protection of well-known trade marks (International Law Office) Revised Chinese patent law aims at quality, compulsory licensing (Intellectual Property Watch) Zen and the art of intellectual property in China (IP Dragon)   Colombia… [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
§1320d-2; In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 493, 497 n.11 (N.J. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 5:20 am by Andrew Frisch
The DBA applies to any construction contracts for public works and public projects that exceed $2,000 in value and to which either the Federal Government or the District of Columbia is a party. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 4:46 pm
" See Br. of Intervenor NBC at 31-32 & n.3 (citing President Bush’s remark to British Prime Minister Tony Blair that the United Nations needed to "get Syria to get Hezbollah to stop doing this shit" and Vice President Cheney’s widely-reported "Fuck yourself" comment to Senator Patrick Leahy on the floor of the U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:17 pm by Bruce Boyden
Motion Picture Ass’n of Am., Inc., 836 F.2d 599, 608 (D.C. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am by Eugene Volokh
In In re Marriage of Suggs, the Washington Supreme Court set aside a civil harassment restraining order that barred "knowingly and willfully making invalid and unsubstantiated allegations or complaints to third parties which are designed for the purpose of annoying, harassing, vexing, or otherwise harming [plaintiff] and for no lawful purpose. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 5:01 am by Terry Hart
Borland Intern., Inc., 49 F. 3d 807, 818 (1st Circuit 1995). [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
This figure is significantly lower than in 2016, when the Delaware Court of Chancery effectively put an end to the practice of disclosure-only settlements in In re Trulia Inc. [read post]