Search for: "May v. Bennett*" Results 361 - 380 of 1,290
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm by Emily Coward
This pattern reflects divergences that the Court may confront when it decides State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jack Sharman
If the list does not help you, it may help me. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 12:26 pm by Olivia Cross
If an application was previously abandoned after being refused registration under the provision, and is beyond the deadline for filing a petition to revive, a new application may be filed. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 12:41 am by Mark Summerfield
A dispute between the firm of Pizzeys Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys – owned by listed entity IPH Limited (ASX:IPH) – and a firm established by two former Pizzeys principals, has gained public exposure through a decision of Justice Jagot in the Federal Court of Australia: Pizzeys Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys Pty Limited v Bennett [2019] FCA 2084. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Data Matters Blog has a post suggesting that British Airways and Marriot International may potentially avoid GDPR fines. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm by Ron Friedmann
  For anyone who reads my strategic legal technology blog, you may recall my interest in “DoLessLaw”, a big element of which is prevention. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:36 am by SHG
Goldman twitted about the denial of cert in Herrick v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
No work of any kind may cross an exact vertical projection of this property line, above or below ground as noted in Anderson v. [read post]