Search for: "P. v. James"
Results 361 - 380
of 2,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2020, 3:56 pm
" (p. 17). [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am
For the record, in Ordered Liberty (2013), a book I co-authored with James E. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm
The judgment in the case of Smith v Jones [2020] NSWDC 262 was given on 28 May 2020. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac injury, constitute the… [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 5:03 am
P. 10(a); see Doe v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 2:31 pm
§ 13-21-111.5(4).[21] [1] James W. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:57 pm
”James v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 8:55 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada reviewed this in 1989 in R. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Véase Pueblo v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 2:04 pm
Alex Omar Rosa Ambert La Comisión de Salud Pública de la Cámara de Representantes continúa celebrando vistas al palio de la Resolución Conjunta 174, que ordenó una investigación sobre el comportamiento de las agencias al atender el Estado de Emergencia provocado por la pandemia del COVID-19. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
One of his arguments is that these studies fail to account for the complexity of amendment “culture”—what Tom Ginsburg and James Melton define as “‘the set of shared attitudes about the desirability of amendment, independent of the substantive issue under consideration and the degree of pressure for change’” (p. 110). [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
A Message [pdf] published this week by the Lord Burnett of Maldon CJ, Sir Terence Etherton MR and Sir Andrew McFarlane P, outlines how the Circuit and District Judges sitting in Civil and Family should deal with remote working. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 12:36 pm
Ayotte v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 10:01 am
“The default position now in all jurisdictions must be that hearings should be conducted with one, more than one or all participants attending remotely”: Message to the Judges in the Civil and Family Courts, Lord Burnett of Maldon (19 March 2020) “It remains the obligation of all involved and at all stages of the hearing, to continue to evaluate whether fairness to all the parties is being achieved. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am
P. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am
§ 853(p) is applied to a forfeiture imposed under any statute via 28 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 9:08 am
Contents include:Carolina Moehlecke, The Chilling Effect of International Investment Disputes: Limited Challenges to State Sovereignty Anastassia V Obydenkova & Vinícius G Rodrigues Vieira, The Limits of Collective Financial Statecraft: Regional Development Banks and Voting Alignment with the United States at the United Nations General Assembly Lauge N Skovgaard Poulsen, Beyond Credible Commitments: (Investment) Treaties as Focal Points Celeste Beesley, Foreign Policy… [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
