Search for: "Patel v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2012, 7:27 am
Structures, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 6:56 am
Patel, 2020 WL 550194 (E.D. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 10:53 am
Paul discussed the Supreme Court’s decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:13 pm
Patel, on police inspection of hotel registries.October 2013: Hall v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:32 pm
The appellate court split 3-2 and defendants have been granted leave to appeal to the state's highest court - the Court of Appeals. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:04 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:15 am
Handing down its judgment on 30 October 2019, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal, with Lady Hale stating that this was a case “bristling with simplicity”. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:39 pm
Pete v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 2:37 pm
February 27, 2014 (Hillsboro) ASHISH PATEL, ANVERALI SATANI, NAZIRA MOMIN... v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 2:30 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 6:20 am
Meachum v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 9:43 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:34 am
If that were the case when they break the deal what shall guide them is the question dealt in Patel Engineering v. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 11:40 pm
Judge Marilyn Hall Patel disagreed, stating that the prosecutor is free to use alternate theories as long as they are supported by the evidence. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am
When there was no arbitration agreement between the parties, without a joint memo or a joint application of the parties, the High Court ought not to have referred the parties to arbitration” (paragraph 39).The Court rejected the respondent’s implied authority argument stating that counsel should not act on implied authority unless there is exigency of circumstances demanding immediate adjustment of suit by agreement or compromise (Byram Pestonji Gariwala v Union Bank of… [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:59 pm
Natalie Orpett sat down with Saraphin Dhanani to discuss United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 7:01 am
In Patel v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 12:58 am
Cal. 2004)(Patel, J.) [read post]
