Search for: "STATE v. FRANCISCO" Results 361 - 380 of 3,747
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2010, 4:31 pm by Stuart Blake
On January 29, 2010, the California Court of Appeal decided in Lhotka v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 9:08 am by Lawrence Taylor
In a follow-up yesterday, the San Francisco Chronicle has confirmed this: SF Not Alone in DUI Test Flaw, Dropped Convictions San Francisco, CA. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:00 am by Emily Chan
Last Tuesday, I had the pleasure of speaking on a panel at an event for the Young Nonprofit Professionals Network San Francisco Bay Area Chapter (YNPNsfba) on “Leadership Through Board Service” with Bruce Marcus, San Francisco State University Instructor of Volunteer and Board Management, Ann Lehman, Planning and Policy Specialist and Partner at Zimmerman Lehman, and John Power, Executive Director of The Volunteer Center serving San Francisco and San… [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 9:13 pm
" But things didn't play out this way in a recent San Francisco case, Jankey v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:17 am by James Bickford
The editorial board of the Miami Herald applauds last week’s decision in Thompson v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 7:15 am by Jane Chong
City & Cty. of San Francisco (2010) (en banc). [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
  Regardless, the State Bar of California will present a webinar on the result within a week or two of the decision. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:28 am
In the five years after the Court invalidated the Gun-Free School Zones Act for exceeding the scope of the federal Commerce Power in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 7:57 pm by Lyle Denniston
District Judge James Ware of San Francisco, who took over the case of Perry v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 9:32 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
If they are (as Wilson's study on state R&D tax credits suggests) a zero-sum game in which states or cities are compelled to pay to attract "star scientists," maybe they should be prohibited under the dormant Commerce Clause, as the Sixth Circuit suggested in Cuno v. [read post]