Search for: "State v. Frye"
Results 361 - 380
of 478
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2011, 9:49 am
Wisconsin courts had rejected the Frye and Daubert tests. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:47 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [2] Frye v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 661 N.E.2d 352, 354 (Ill. 1996); Frye v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:30 am
Brian also reviews Wal-Mart v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 12:19 pm
State Courts Betz v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 5:04 am
” These two articles, along with the recent New Hampshire Supreme Court decision in Baxter v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 4:39 am
Additional Resources: Gutierrez v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 1:26 pm
One was a Florida Supreme Court ruling in Charles v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 12:42 pm
With that symbolic opener out of the way, the Court on Tuesday reversed its new surrogate Ninth, the Sixth Circuit in Burt v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:07 pm
This would be a Scott v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm
Starrs, “Frye v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 12:21 pm
Frye v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:13 pm
Frye, defense counsel failed to communicate an offer which, if accepted, would have reduced the exposure for a driving offense; in Laffler v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am
March 9, 2010) (“the plain language of the statute states that it only applies when the local defendants have been ‘properly joined and served’”); Haseko Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Frye, 10-444, and Lafler v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Preemption, of course, would be The Beatles, and Daubert/Frye the Rolling Stones. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:45 am
Corbitt… In State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 12:18 pm
Frye and State Farm, Dauphin, 2008 CV 17687 (request to sever UIM claim and third party claim denied). [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:34 pm
***In United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:52 am
Additionally, all state courts have not adopted the Daubert standard yet and still follow their own principles (read Frye) for admissibility of expert testimony. [read post]
