Search for: "State v. Lilly"
Results 361 - 380
of 910
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:58 am
DSI currently co-promotes Effient® products in the United States with Lilly. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
This lawsuit adds another defendant, Panacea, to Lilly's Indiana patent litigation. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:44 pm
In this post, guest contributor Paul England (Taylor Wessing LLP) explains the legal issues and their consequences:UKIPO -- a 'court' for the purposes of the Brussels I Regulation Some courts look like this ...With Actavis v Eli Lilly [noted on the IPKat here] still fresh in our minds, and amendments to the Brussels I Regulation (recast) progressing through the European Parliament in preparation for the Unified Patent Court, jurisdictional matters are a hot… [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:08 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 4:43 am
Louisiana joined the fray late in Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
April 11, 2002); Lillie v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 3:58 pm
Speakers include in-house counsel from Eli Lilly, Mylan, Sandoz, Amgen, AbbVie, Momenta, J&J, and Actavis. [read post]
21 May 2014, 7:41 am
See Geib v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
So this moggy is enormously grateful to his EIP colleague Matthew Jones, for preparing a report of this case, which came out at the same time as the Actavis v Lilly decision. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
On the principle of the matter, he stated at 111:In my judgment this reasoning [from Rohm & Haas] is persuasive, and it is supported by the subsequent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Virgin v Premium. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:23 am
"All this is compliant with the GAT and Folien decisions and the Corte di Cassazione ruling, as well the UK decision in Joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) and Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [here]. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
Lust v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:17 am
Since its release in 1999, Actos has generated more than $16 billion in sales for Lilly and Takeda, who partnered together to produce and market the drug in the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:17 am
Since its release in 1999, Actos has generated more than $16 billion in sales for Lilly and Takeda, who partnered together to produce and market the drug in the United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 6:47 pm
See Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 2:36 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 696 N.E.2d 187 (Ohio 1998); Kurczi v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 12:33 pm
But just as Gore was a commercial transaction, so too was State Farm v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 1:17 pm
Takeda and Lilly face hundreds more claims over Actos in state courts including Nevada and Illinois. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:02 am
§285), and numerous states have taken action against NPE's as well. [read post]
