Search for: "State v. McDonnell"
Results 361 - 380
of 639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm
The petition of the day is: McDonnell v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 10:33 am
, 2015 VT 108By Elizabeth KruskaI had completely forgotten about the three-part burden-shifting test from McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 2:33 am
In Torres v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
With the football season upon us, and interesting decision comes out of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in the form of Dorley v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:58 pm
Last month, the OFCCP published in the Federal Register (80 FR 54934-54977) its final rule on regulations to implement Executive Order (EO) 13665 signed by President Obama in April 2014 which prohibits federal contractors from retaliating against employees who choose to discuss their compensation. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 12:16 pm
States: States have likewise adopted increased protections in this context. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:28 am
By Cynthia L. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 10:08 pm
McDonnell, Robert J. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 7:19 am
That derives from Gallagher v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:58 am
State action. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Christopher Meyer looks at the impact of last Term’s decision in Baker Botts v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm
Those decisions, which upheld employers’ affirmative action plans against Title VII challenges, called for application of the three-step burden-shifting framework set forth by the High Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp v Green (3 EPD ¶8607). [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
I’ve recently been blogging about my new article, The Inherent-Powers Corollary: Judicial Non-Delegation and Federal Common Law, which I’ve posted to SSRN. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 8:31 am
Judge Ludington dissented (Moffat v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 11:36 am
A recent Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision, however, France v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 6:15 am
McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974). [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
Plaintiff is Caucasian and a Canadian citizen with Permanent Resident status in the United States. . . . [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 8:10 am
Citing the cat’s paw doctrine, the court pointed out that in Poland v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 7:58 am
After an exhaustive analysis of the current state of the pleading standard for Title VII complaints falling under the McDonnell Douglas framework, the Second Circuit concluded that Iqbal did not affect the benefit to plaintiffs pronounced in the McDonnell Douglas quartet. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 2:20 pm
See Shirrell v. [read post]
