Search for: "State v. Nicks"
Results 361 - 380
of 736
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2012, 2:57 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 7:54 pm
One man, Nick Cater had been working on the story for around two years. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
Policing such behavior, the court concludes, is a matter for the states, because it isn't authorized as a regulation of commerce or as necessary and proper to comply with treaties.The decision, handed down today, is U.S. v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
Policing such behavior, the court concludes, is a matter for the states, because it isn't authorized as a regulation of commerce or as necessary and proper to comply with treaties.The decision, handed down today, is U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 10:15 am
Last week's decision in Carr v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 8:48 am
Ninth Circuit: If the Supreme Court can call a health-care exchange established by the federal government “an exchange established by [a] State,” see King v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 5:11 am
In Davids v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 5:55 am
” Over at Forbes.com, IJ Communications Associate Nick Sibilla explains why the High Court’s decision in Nelson v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 6:37 am
Discussing the likely outcome of these challenges at the Court, Nick Bravin argues at Dorf on Law that, although “all eyes will be focused on Justice Kennedy,” the Justice’s oft-repeated emphasis on liberty and states’ rights might instead lead supporters of the law to seek an “unlikely ally” in Justice Scalia. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:57 am
If the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am
In Sands v The State of South Australia ([2010] SASC 340) the Supreme Court considered an application for a stay on the grounds of public interest immunity in an action for libel and misfeasance arising out of statements made in the course of a murder investigation. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:02 pm
Wiencek v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 12:19 pm
SUPREME COURT Gideon v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am
In the courts: Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14 (30 March 2011): Supreme Court: Teachers employed by Sec of State to work abroad at European Schools entitled to the protection against unfair dismissal – see the Education Law Blog. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
Several professors caught up in the controversy I have outlined have stated that, going forward, in light of protest, they will no longer vocalize "nigger. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 6:41 am
Most notably and most recently, the California Supreme Court ruled for the defense in O’Neil v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:01 am
Oracle v Google (Case No. 14-410) is one of the most important copyright cases currently pending before the US courts (see a previous post here). [read post]
30 May 2016, 10:00 am
Nick Smallwood explores the IP issues at play and the lighter side of personal image and trade mark rights. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 3:17 am
Sudeer v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:46 am
Black v. [read post]
