Search for: "State v. Singh "
Results 361 - 380
of 619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
December(1) Vance v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am
Herrmann, United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 7:15 am
Tata Sons Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:35 am
Kevin Russell was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
December(1) Vance v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:32 pm
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
Be sure to read Stewart Baker’s post at Volokh Conspiracy in response to DNI Clapper’s statement, as well as Orin Kerr’s post at the same blog focusing on the legal standard Clapper invoked in his statement—the Terry v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:03 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
Tejinder Singh analyzes the Court’s opinion for this blog, explaining that “[t]he holding rests on the rationale . . . that [the federal law] seeks to honor the employee’s choice of beneficiary, and any state attempt to redirect the proceeds conflicts with that objective and is therefore preempted. [read post]
27 May 2013, 7:05 am
In addition, the firm is among the counsel to the respondent in Air Wisconsin, and Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell is among the counsel on an ;amicus brief filed by international human rights advocates in support of the respondents in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:15 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:22 am
” [Disclosure: Tejinder Singh of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by international human rights advocates in support of the respondents in Perry.] [read post]
3 May 2013, 11:16 am
Interestingly, the Volokh Conspiracy notes that the New York Supreme Court held today in Bezio v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 6:11 am
Perry (the challenge to Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 11:41 am
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court gave a disturbing judgment in Devender Pal Singh Bhullar v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 10:39 pm
Microsoft debate, with two of our readers, Sridhar Gautam and Harjodh Singh, being quite vocal to condemn this ‘monopolistic’ action by Microsoft and AICTE facilitating the same. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 8:49 am
; JURIST has additional coverage of Wednesday’s oral arguments in Nassar and Metrish v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 6:05 am
SPEAK is represented by Swathi Sukumar, an IP counsel and director of i-Probono and Mr Chander Uday Singh, a senior counsel. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:30 am
Wells noted the Supreme Court’s decision ;in Kiobel v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am
Perry ;and United States v. [read post]
