Search for: "The Confederate Note Case"
Results 361 - 380
of 793
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans). [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 4:42 pm
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation, 447 U.S. 134 (1980), where the Supreme Court noted that certain tribal smokeshops were offering “solely an exemption from state taxation. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 12:48 pm
Whitney's machine was entirely new . . . . n159While the court noted that principles were not patentable, the statement was merely an aside to the important question in the case: how the patentee applied the principles and whether the prior art applied the same principles. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 1:32 pm
Indeed, the celebrations, in that respect are noted to be a special salute to America, foreshadowing something unconventional that may follow. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:05 pm
As Roberts himself noted, contradicting his terrible dissent in the Arizona electoral commission case, a number of states do allow their citizenry to seize control of the redistricting project away from self-interested party hacks. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 4:01 pm
I merely note that this is one of those cases where you can almost certainly figure out the result merely by reading the tea leaves.)Okay, so I know the result in advance. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Here is a note to any library directors reading this post, legacy memory is important. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 11:02 pm
And what the hell is up with that stupid ass confederate flag belt buckle. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 5:08 pm
At least in this case, private rules rule. [read post]
26 Nov 2021, 4:03 am
In an Order on Guidelines Calculations in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
Under the Articles of Confederation, the Confederation Congress had no dependable source of tax revenue. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 12:00 pm
Trump’s own Department of Justice brought and won this case. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 12:14 pm
” In that case, Alito asked, how should the Supreme Court proceed? [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:45 am
The opinion notes that “this case is not the first case where the State mischaracterized the evidence and testimony and then used that mischaracterization in trial and appeal,” and cautions that “this court not condone this tactic and its continued use is abhorrent to the judicial system itself and the public’s confidence in the judicial system. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:02 am
I note that you relate this case to an earlier incident in Sanford’s life when, as member of the University of Tennessee’s board of trustees, he “tried to avoid taking a position on the religiously-charged evolution debate. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
But in both cases, one might resist Gienapp’s characterization of these efforts as genuinely historical. [read post]
8 May 2017, 7:43 am
Note that it is the "privileges or immunities" of citizens, not persons, which is used in the remainder of the sentence.The words "privileges and immunities appear in Article IV: [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:38 am
(If Congress has authority, we should note, another clause in the Constitution, the Supremacy Clause, would quash contrary state action.) [read post]
15 May 2017, 7:35 am
Farrand’s Records is a four-volume set of documentary records of the Constitutional Convention, containing “notes taken at that time by James Madison, and later revised by him, [ . . . ] notes and letters by many other participants, as well as the various constitutional plans proposed during the convention. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:10 pm
UPDATE #2: I should note that Justice Stevens’ separate dissent in McDonald makes a similar argument to Breyer’s (pp. 35–37 of the slip opinion). [read post]
