Search for: "U.S. v. Austin*" Results 361 - 380 of 1,525
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Preliminary Objections by a NY defendant firm contesting jurisdiction in a legal malpractice case were denied in the matter of Rock v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
It infected as much as 25% of the U.S. population and killed over 675,000 Americans. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 2:58 pm by Craig Ball
He limits his practice to serving as a court-appointed special master and consultant in computer forensics and electronic discovery and has served as the special master or testifying expert in computer forensics and electronic discovery in some of the most challenging and celebrated cases in the U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 7:28 pm by Chris Castle
  A “Force Majeure Event” is defined as acts, omissions, accidents and events which are beyond the reasonable control of the party claiming Force Majeure and which prohibit that party’s performance of its obligations under this Agreement including, without limitation, (i) acts of God, (ii) strikes or labor disruptions in the metropolitan area where the Event is scheduled to be held, (iii) civil riots or disturbances in the metropolitan area where the Event is scheduled to be… [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
The Justice Department’s well-known experience with trying to extradite the Megaupload conspirators since 2012 is a prime example of the lengths to which these brazen racketeering organizations will go to avoid U.S. justice while simultaneously claiming the protection of U.S. law. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 11:56 am by Leah Litman and Steve Vladeck
The U.S. solicitor general blithely suggests that the court’s cases have apparently taken a new direction. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm by Schachtman
All the parties’ epidemiology witnesses invoked Sir Austin Bradford Hill’s viewpoints or factors for judging whether associations were causal.[15] Although they embraced Hill’s viewpoints on causation, the plaintiffs’ epidemiologic expert witnesses had a much more difficult time faithfully applying them to the evidence at hand. [read post]