Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 361 - 380
of 9,756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2018, 6:03 am
Marcoski objected, arguing that an award would be clearly inappropriate because she acted in good faith when she removed L.N.R. to the United States. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
At least that is the person I heard when I read your 1973 article and who materialized at the Convention.So, as an advocate for child sex abuse victims across the United States, I ask you—what will you do as President of the United States about child sex abuse to stem the pain, to increase justice, and to ultimately reduce this billion-dollar burden on our healthcare system? [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 1:29 am
We posted last week on Carson and Others v The United Kingdom (read judgment), in which the European Court of Human Rights rejected a claim that UK pensioners living abroad should have their pensions index-linked (i.e., that they be raised in line with inflation). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:15 am
In Elsevier N.V. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 11:28 am
Today’s en banc decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Aqua Products, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 6:53 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 9:18 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 8:15 am
The Association and its incorporators sued, alleging violations of the Free Exercise and Equal Protection Clauses of the United States Constitution, several provisions of the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, the Alabama Constitution, and state common-law principles. [read post]
1 May 2016, 3:56 pm
However, as Molina-Martinez v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:18 pm
Today the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in the Microsoft v. i4i case. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:53 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:00 pm
The fact that the United States has issued a travel warning to citizens traveling to Michoacán, Mexico is insufficient to establish that Michoacán, Mexico is a war zone. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:15 am
Alvarez: Trademark Dilution and the First AmendmentEarlier this week, the United States Supreme Court handed down its opinion on the Stolen Valor Act (18 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 9:28 am
See Bader v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 5:11 pm
United States 17-1516 Issues: (1) Whether the Supreme Court’s prior precedent applying the discretionary-function exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act to government employees acting on the operational level should be modified to accord with Justice Scalia’s concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 5:08 am
Camden-Clark Memorial Hospital Association v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 10:26 am
Arizona V. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 11:23 am
Weexplained that the Board’s interpretation of its regulationsin denying the proposed amendment was reasonableunder the particular circumstances in Proxyconn and wasconsistent with the United States Patent and TrademarkOffice’s (“PTO’s”) position expressed in the Board’s informativedecision in Idle Free Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
