Search for: "Ex Parte Clear"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 5,119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2011, 7:27 am
Certainly, a third party may still resort to ex parte reexamination (EXP), but that option is much less attractive for third party requesters based on historical results. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:27 pm
However, the wording “made in part of” is not acceptable. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 2:10 pm
Tricky things, ex parte interim injunctions. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 2:10 pm
Tricky things, ex parte interim injunctions. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 9:50 pm
Supp. 2d 1, 4 (D.D.C. 2002), the most refreshing part of the all-too-predictable result was the following footnote: “Interestingly, Representative Kucinich, the lead plaintiff in Kucinich v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:04 am
The number of new ex parte reexam appeals filed during FY2011 was down from 158 to 125. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:03 am
Other times, we have received an apology so vague it was not clear if the person was in fact apologizing. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:10 am
Certainly, a third party may still resort to ex parte reexamination (EXP), but that option is much less attractive for third party requesters based on historical results. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm
(Orin Kerr) My co-blogger David Post has authored several passionate posts harshly criticizing the federal government’s recent practice of seizing domain names pursuant to ex parte court orders based on probable cause. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:34 am
*Sometimes it will be crystal clear from the allegations of the complaint that the claim is baloney ("I was fired because I'm a woman. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
And although some Justices appeared to agree with the federal government that there is no right to sue in Medicaid cases like this, others questioned whether private parties should ever be able to sue states to enforce federal laws – a right that almost everyone had (at least until Monday) regarded as well-established, dating back to the Court’s decision over a century ago in a case called Ex parte Young. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 8:31 am
Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 203.10[2][a], at 14 (3d ed. 2005)).In this case, the district court entered an order ex- pressly denying Bosch’s motion for entry of a permanent injunction. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:30 pm
Traditionally, the answer has been yes under the doctrine of Ex Parte Young, but another line of cases says that there are no private rights of action to enforce statutes unless the statutory language manifests Congressional intent to create such private rights of action. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:31 am
Question 2: In ex parte reexam, the broadest reaosnable construction standard will still apply. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:10 am
A first ex parte patent reexamination was favorably concluded to i4i without amendment to the original claims (90/010,347), and the second request was denied outright (90/011,198) on November 24, 2010. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Fletcher (1866), L.R. 1 Ex. 265, aff’d (1868), L.R. 3 H.L. 330 for that loss. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:41 am
It wasn’t the cultural life that he missed, nor was it the ex-girlfriend I always suspected he pined for. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:05 am
It wasn’t the cultural life that he missed, nor was it the ex-girlfriend I always suspected he pined for. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:55 pm
These procedures, often generally referred to collectively as post-grant procedures, include a new procedure, known as “post-grant opposition,” the existing ex parte re-examination procedure, and a modified inter partes re-examination procedure now called “inter partes review. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 7:38 am
Sony has now replied to that suit by requesting reexamination of theWalker patent (see ex parte Request No. (10)). [read post]
