Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 3781 - 3800
of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2019, 2:39 am
Robert B. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:35 am
At Letters Blogatory, Ted Folkman looks at the decision, noting that the opinion puts the state and federal courts in the United States “on the same page with the Special Commission of the Hague Conference, the US State Department, most if not all foreign courts, and more or less all writers on the subject. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 7:08 am
Republican candidates pledge not to appoint “activists,” and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton apparently pledged to pick justices who would commit to overturning Citizens United. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court based its reasoning largely around the Supreme Court of the United States opinion rendered in Troxel v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 4:19 am
United States, in which Gorsuch “sets forth a property rights-based argument for the protection of cell phone data under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 7:43 am
This is because the "penalty" no longer fits the definition of a tax articulated by Chief Justice Roberts in NFIB v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 9:24 am
The State of New Jersey, 174 NJ 412 (2002). [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:35 am
(The other same-sex marriage case was United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 7:03 pm
WJLA reported:The Robert E. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
The law pretty much everywhere else in these United States is that you have to have two working brake lights. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court's use of history (and various reflections on the use of history in judicial decisionmaking) in the recently decided Second Amendment case United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:54 pm
Bryant AnnexCourtroom 31333 Constitution Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20001For more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-stateshttps://www.woodhullfoundation.org/our-work/fosta/For more on FOSTA:https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/03/how-congress-censored-internet Contact: DavidGreeneCivil Liberties Directordavidg@eff.org [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 9:30 pm
United States (University of Washington Press) by Gordon K. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:57 am
In Budinich v. [read post]
Argument analysis: Justices seem primed to find constitutional limits on the detention of immigrants
4 Oct 2017, 9:44 am
Deputy Solicitor General Malcom Stewart began for the United States by “stress[ing] the breadth of Congress’s constitutional authority to establish the rules under which aliens will be allowed to enter and remain in the United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 2:43 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States began its October 2012 term last week. [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 3:38 pm
The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:00 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, Filed: December 10, 1999. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 8:05 am
” United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:00 am
Magarian’s comments on today’s decisions follow: The DOMA decision, United States v. [read post]
