Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 3781 - 3800 of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
United States—a case involving the health care fraud statute—could have been written by Justice Scalia. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 10:33 am by Amy Howe
Four justices – Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Clarence Thomas – agreed in Vieth v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
United States, in which the justices held 5-4 that the government ordinarily needs a warrant to access historical cell-site location information. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:33 pm by Liz Campbell
Surveillance is of critical importance in the investigation of serious and organised crime, in determining the extent and patterns of criminal behaviour, and in the gathering of evidence to construct a case against a suspect; thus it has been described as one of the most important legal weapons deployed by the United States against Mafia groups and families (see Jacobs, Busting the Mob: United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:59 am by Lyle Denniston
Winn, et al. (09-987) and Garriott v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:38 am
An explicit statement that courts’ regulating their own procedure was a proper judicial function came a few days later, in Bank of the United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 12:00 am
After the recent decision by the United States Supreme Court in Warger v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In addition to his many important decisions, Story’s three-volume Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States was and remains extremely influential.Neither Marshall nor Story is an uncomplicated hero, however. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:49 am by boston
”Americans United filed a friend-of-the-court brief in this case, Sherman v. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Court’s Myopia The plurality opinion in McCutcheon, like the majority opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]