Search for: "A P.2." Results 3821 - 3840 of 27,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2023, 4:34 am by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
To submit a paper for presentation at WIPS7, please send an abstract of approximately 300 words by 15 March 2023 to Prof Péter Mezei (mezei.peter@szte.hu). [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 8:55 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"3 Indeed, nowhere in the text of either section 230(c)(1) or (c)(2)(A) does the statute place any obligation on a provider or a user to screen offensive material. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 9:06 am
It was just a few months ago that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (BMB v Ferrero, C‑693/17 P) sided with well-known foodstuffs manufacturer Ferrero by upholding the invalidity of a registered Community design right for comfit boxes and containers pursuant to Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation No 6/2002. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 8:35 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
These types of marks may not be registered on the Principal Register under §2(f). [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 3:40 am
Here, dictionary definitions alone were were sufficient to satisfy the PTO's burden to establish a prima facie case.Examining Attorney Carolyn P. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 12:24 pm
Today the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its ruling in Case C‑583/12 Sintax [or, if you prefer, Syntax: the CJEU uses both spellings] Trading OÜ v Maksu- ja Tolliameti Põhja maksu- ja tollikeskus, a reference for a preliminary ruling from Estonia's Riigikohus. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 8:02 am
Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, Vol. 25, p. 873, 2012; Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2176252. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 1:18 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
There is no requirement that the petitionerhave Article III standing, as “[p]arties that initiate[IPRs] need not have a concrete stake in the outcome;indeed, they may lack constitutional standing. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:43 am by Jon L. Gelman
For the loss of a first finger (index finger), the award of workers’ compensation shall be calculated based on a maximum of 60 weeks of compensation; 2. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 8:35 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
These types of marks may not be registered on the Principal Register under §2(f). [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm
Sherwood filed its answer and asserted counterclaims against third party defendant BamBams, LLC alleging that the counterclaim-defendants, including BamBams, made false statements in advertisements regarding Expand-A-Banner and had tortiously interfered with plaintiff's business relationships.BamBams moved to preclude Sherwood from offering: (1) Bank of America deposit slips and cancelled checks for 2006; (2) the balance sheet and P&L statements Sherwood obtained from its… [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 6:39 am by Eleonora Rosati
Under EU trade mark law, there is no express freedom of expression-based defence.But can third-party freedom of expression be safeguarded through the way in which the infringement test, notably the test for trade marks with a reputation and the notion of "due cause" (Article 9(2)(c) EUTMR; Article 10(6) and (2)(c) EUTMD), is construed? [read post]