Search for: "M & B, Inc." Results 3821 - 3840 of 4,037
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2009, 1:23 pm
Background In August 2004, the board of directors of First Niles Financial, Inc. authorized a process to sell the company, and retained financial and legal advisors to assist. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 7:39 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
Decision of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal The Court of Appeal reviewed the seminal decisions of Cardozo J. in Jacob & Youngs Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Events driving derivative litigation include: sexual harassment; data breaches; privacy violations; M&A transactions; public, workplace and product safety; and antitrust, FDA, FCPA, FCA and other regulatory issues. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 7:45 pm by Richard Hunt
I’m sure they wouldn’t agree with that characterization, but it follows naturally from an analysis of the majority opinion and its disregard of the truth-finding purpose of a trial.(4) The first sign that the Court’s concern is policy rather than the truth is its decision to take up the issue of the plaintiff’s standing in the first place. [read post]
24 May 2021, 3:56 am by Peter Mahler
I’m guessing he was left out of the federal action because his inclusion would have destroyed diversity jurisdiction. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:37 am by Peter Mahler
Since the Supreme Court’s two opinions broke no significant new ground concerning the oppression claim vis-à-vis the prior appellate ruling that I posted about previously, in this post I’m going to focus instead on the more interesting clash of the majority and concurring opinions over the plaintiff’s direct claim for breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am by Arthur F. Coon
Other Developments Finally, I’m honored to be co-presenting on a panel with Jo [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Investia Financial Services Inc., decided on September 23, 2011, addressed the conduct characterized as workplace harassment although that was not the main point of the case. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:03 pm
(artigo 96, II, b e f; artigo 105, § 1º; artigo 106 ao 113; por fim, § 5º do art. 11 e art. 12 do ADCT da Constituição do Ceará). [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Check out this case:It basically states that unless your lender actually signs your loan modification agreement then YOU DON'T HAVE A LOAN MODIFICATION.Has anyone actually gotten a signed loan modification? [read post]