Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 7,433
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2014, 11:42 am
This patently unfair system is illustrated by a recent Ford lemon law case I handled, which illustrates how the rules are being used to line the pockets (by minimizing the losses) of vehicle manufacturers participating in the BBB Auto Line. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 11:42 am
This patently unfair system is illustrated by a recent Ford lemon law case I handled, which illustrates how the rules are being used to line the pockets (by minimizing the losses) of vehicle manufacturers participating in the BBB Auto Line. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 9:26 am
Presumably the Moto X, which will become available in Germany soon, does not have this iconic feature.Today I found out that the Munich appeals court has vacated the Thursday hearing (technically, these are two hearings: one lawsuit targets Motorola Mobility, the U.S. company, and the other one the German subsidiary). [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 12:00 am
[ix] http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20130512/TECHNOLOGY/305129987 [x] Id. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:27 am
On average, does it work? [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 9:28 am
It is a big leap from saying that a journal retains some level of usefulness for X number of years to saying that an embargo shorter than X will lead to cancelled subscriptions, yet I think that is the argument that is being made. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:17 am
So in principle, the argument “I’m a Muslim, and I think Islamic law forbids behavior X, so I should be exempted from a legal requirement to do X” might sometimes prevail. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 2:07 pm
II Because I was a photographer and my work was documentary in nature–homeless women; itinerant migrant workers; and a decade photographing Guatemala’s 1980s armed conflict–I wanted to love The Cruel Radiance, and to a degree I did. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 3:17 am
It’s natural to assume that if a business is physically based in County X that a dissolution proceeding is properly brought in Supreme Court in County X. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 11:14 am
I’ll confess that I fall outside that gap, but a self-administered Pew Research Centre quiz suggests that culturally I am far more millennial than I am Generation X (the only factor missing is my parents are still together). [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 10:51 am
An example of a general legacy is “I give [pounds] 100 to X”: Wood Estate v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
The AmeriKat could entertain (or perhaps bore) some of you with details of their view, but it does not make for a very interesting read because they essentially agreed with Floyd J’s reasoning and upheld him on every point.What was interesting was the point on non-designation of the '908 patent. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 1:28 pm
"I was very misinformed about the need for imaging." [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 2:35 pm
“As I sat there, I thought: The president doesn’t trust his commander [Petraeus], can’t stand Karzai, doesn’t believe in his own strategy and doesn’t consider the war to be his,” Mr. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
App’x 975 (Fed. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 7:55 pm
The government says otherwise--that it does not have such authority with respect to "church plans." [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 4:12 pm
I’ll update you as news becomes available. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:52 am
Furthermore, the court suggested that Reznikoff’s evidence might have been sufficient were it not for concession: “I am sorry I can’t give you any statistics, but we don’t have them. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 5:01 pm
It is not enough to argue that the claim should be read in a particular way when the wording of the claim does not require this. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:45 am
The Tribunal does not order refunds. [read post]
