Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 4,608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2017, 12:17 pm
C-572/13, HP v Reprobel) and bold lawmakers (cf. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 9:52 am
Woulfe v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:15 pm
What does it mean to transform an article into a different state or thing? [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:55 am
In Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
Horvath, Heller Ehrman LLP, New York, NY Highlights in competitor and consumer lawsuits: Axcan v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:01 pm
In Aggravation: V. snarky assholes. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 11:05 am
Finally, Part V of this article concludes that, while it is unlikely that the Green Bay Packers will be joined by any other major league teams with public shareholders, the adoption of minor amendments to the JOBS Act and to state law could facilitate the use of crowdfunding in ways that lead to the increased public ownership of sports teams in the minor leagues or in newly created professional sports leagues. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(Patent Prospector) US-Korea adopt patent prosecution highway (Law360) (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) Global Global - General Obama, patent reform, patent litigation in the USA and Europe – IP Think Tank podcast 26 January 2009 (IP Think Tank) Intangible values collapse – the old 70% to 80% claim is now officially dead and buried (IAM) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Managing value in a shrinking economy: the IP audit (IP Frontline) Downturn… [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm
Art, Music and Copyright IPKat has an article on Spotify’s decision to accord Adele’s request to remove the “shuffle” function on her new album, 30, so that the default setting meant fans listened to the work in the order she intended. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:08 am
The First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Age Moderator: Karyn Temple Claggett, Associate Register of Copyrights and Director of Policy & International Affairs, United States Copyright Office Previous Copyright Office study concluded that first sale only covers distribution and thus doesn’t apply in digital context where reproductions are involved. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 9:00 am
(UK Channel Management Ltd v E! [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
Katz Technology Licensing drops Covington & Burling as counsel (Law 360) Economic downturn = downturn in patent filings (PatentlyO) Challenging the strong presumption of patent validity (PatentlyO) USPTO Extends patent prosecution highway pilot with Australia and begins pilot with Germany (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions Jury awards Uniloc $388m in patent suit v Microsoft (Law 360) (IP Down Under) CAFC finds for Honda in defending truck bed patent suit by… [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
As similarly confirmed by CanLII’s former President, Colin Lachance in, “Law’s Reverse Musical Chair Challenge” (Slaw, June 16, 2016). [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:30 am
In the Second Circuit, there is a case called Cheeks v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 5:58 am
Kansas v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 10:41 am
USPTO Director Kappos has stated that by including the PCT "more work can be shared between our two offices. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 11:22 am
Funny ones really. 00:35:19 gretchen desutter: A favorite scene with Monica was a Twins v Yankees game. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 8:47 am
Accessed November 1, 2022. https://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/6b0efb70-cdbb-9c8e-e040-e00a18065a96 In the 1854 case, O’Reilly et al. v. [read post]
