Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 3861 - 3880 of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
Lifestyle Equities C.V. and another v Ahmed and another, heard 20th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 Secretary of State for Transport v… [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether stock options are taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, and Chavez-Meza v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 8:01 am by Jordan M. Asch
The United States Supreme Court recently handed down a decision that directly addresses this concern. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 4:30 pm by Craig R. Tractenberg
On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment in all respects. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]
8 May 2018, 9:50 am by Deborah Pearlstein
  Most views cluster around the conclusion I tend to share: the question whether the President can be compelled to testify was formally left open by United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm by Beth Hutchens
Shortly thereafter, it filed a trademark application for “APP STORE” in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 4:49 pm
    FCA  uses  the  SIG’s  marks on its head units and in product publications. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 1:59 pm
Supreme Court announced it would review lethal injection through Baze v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Ellen Nakashima reports that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]