Search for: "In re Miller "
Results 3881 - 3900
of 4,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
Miller, 405 F.3d 700, 25 A.L.R.6th 695 (8th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 126 S. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:22 am
In reaching this conclusion, the court initially cited to the opinion of the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, in In re Michael, 694 N.E.2d 538 (Ohio App. 2 Dist. 1997). [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
In Descamps, Justice Kagan wrote for the Supreme Court on an issue that permeates our work as federal defenders: what impact do prior convictions have on our clients’ freedom? [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
We’re not entirely sure, but to some extent not discussing damages means not discussing losing. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
It talks about legal standards, and its logic is interesting (note: if you're bright, you'll be able to tell what parts of the opinion could just as easily gone the other way if the Court had so chosen). [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4] At the… [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 5:48 am
They have no way to re-integrate into society. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
Denkowski re-administered the WAIS-III and Mr. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
App. 1999); Zehel-Miller v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
., which calls itself "the world's largest packer of honey," says he makes no specific requirement to the pollen content of the 85 million pounds of honey his company buys.Groeb sells retail under the Miller's brand and says he buys 100 percent pure honey, but does not "specify nor do we require that the pollen be left in or be removed. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:10 pm
Wife filed three OSC re Contempts against the Husband, including one in which the Court in August, 2006, ordered the parties to meet and confer in a 4-way, as to which Ken "refused to meet and confer if attorney Andrew G. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
App. 1978), aff’d, 402 N.E.2d 194 (Ill. 1980) (not recognized in Illinois); Miller v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
John Elwood reviews this week’s relisted cases. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
In a published opinion filed December 6, 2022, the Third District Court of Appeal reversed in part and affirmed in part the trial court’s judgment denying writ petitions in consolidated actions challenging the EIR for a major state government project affecting the Historic State Capitol Building and Annex in Sacramento. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
John Elwood reviews the first relists of 2019. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
On May 12, 2022, the First District Court of Appeal filed a 108-page published opinion affirming a judgment denying a CEQA writ petition that challenged Marin County’s approval of a 43-lot single-family residential subdivision on a 110-acre parcel atop a mountain overlooking the Town of Tiburon and San Francisco Bay. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:37 am
Condition 22 provided that if such circumstances occurred, Cal-Am would apply to County to extend the idle period, obtain a new use permit for adaptive re-use of the site, restore the site to the extent feasible, and/or implement a feasible alternative for site use and/or restoration. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm
In a partially-published, 150-page slip opinion resolving appeals in consolidated cases, and filed February 25, 2020, the Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part a trial court decision finding CEQA defects in the 1800-plus page EIR prepared for Kern County’s adoption of an ordinance designed to provide a streamlined, ministerial permitting process for new oil and gas wells in the county. [read post]
