Search for: "State v. David" Results 3881 - 3900 of 14,229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2015, 5:42 pm by Patricia Salkin
Plaintiffs David Witt and Kinuyo Gochaku Witt brought an action against the Village of Mamaroneck and Building Inspector Robert Melillo pursuant to 42 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:45 am by Lawrence Solum
The Fourth Amendment tipping point was marked this term by United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 5:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
On July 21, 2010 the Supreme Court of Wisconsin decided Sands v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 11:41 am by Victoria Clark
Across court documents, the Justice Department cites United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:53 am by James Bickford
  The Cleveland Plain Dealer reports on David Mills, the young appellate lawyer who will argue on behalf of the petitioner, an Ohio woman who was sexually assaulted in a state prison. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 8:37 am by Steven Cohen
Facts:  In this case (Keystone Transportation Solutions, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 10:40 am by Steve Hall
David Oshinsky, the Pulitzer Prize-winning UT historian, is the author of Capital Punishment on Trial: Furman v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
, Irene BloemraadPart V Membership in the State and Beyond 25. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
The Egilman Challenge There was a challenge to the testimony of another expert witness, David Egilman, a frequent testifier for Mark Lanier and other lawsuit industrialists. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 5:01 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Polling Issue The United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit issued an opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of David M. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Lucia v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  Indeed, Article 21(1) of the GDPR specifically states that the successful exercise of the right to objection must result in the controller “no longer process[ing] the personal data”. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 3:34 pm by Will Baude
But I am still surprised when I see people make this mistake, or see people who assume that Adarand and Bolling v. [read post]
16 Dec 2017, 4:55 am by Vanessa Sauter
David Houck provided an update on United States v. al-Nashiri, where an ethics expert testified on the defense team’s withdrawal. [read post]