Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 7,399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2022, 4:00 pm
It does not take long before the process to identify potential heirs is unwieldy. [read post]
27 May 2015, 8:44 am
As such, absent hindsight, we fail to see why one having ordinary skill in the art would have been led by the teachings of Petite to modify the temperature remote system of Kolk in the manner claimed.My two cents: I picked this decision because it illustrates a good way to attack an obviousness rejection: advantageous function X provided by reference B is not a proper reason to combine if reference A already has advantageous function X. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 10:52 am
Which I think does a good job of addressing the theme behind Jeff and Balaji’s questions: if the 90 day calendar is inhibiting the team’s execution, you shouldn’t let the OKR framework be so rigid that it forces unnatural commitments. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 6:11 am
” “If a law firm does not perform conflicts checks on its thought-leadership marketing content, Lawyer C could write a blog post or client alert advocating for Position X without realizing that their colleague Lawyer D is currently arguing the exact opposite of Position X on behalf of Client D before a trial court in an active lawsuit. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 7:46 am
In this post, I would like to introduce several whistleblowing issues around the world based on the report. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 1:47 pm
However, a patient walking into a doctor's office or even going to the emergency room by ambulance does not qualify for disaster protocol. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:50 pm
Jurisdiction is unusually important in defamation and privacy cases, because the Rome II Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 864/2007), which harmonises choice of law rules for non-contractual claims, does not apply to cases of this kind (art. 1(2)(g)). [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 11:08 am
If it is illegal for the executive to spend money on X, it is also illegal for him to offer to continue to spend it on X so long as Congress does what he wants on some other issue. [read post]
2 May 2019, 10:44 am
So I may use their rulings as a basis for my decision on whether to allow it or not. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 9:36 pm
Example: A is here on an H-1B visa to work only for company X. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:20 am
But Levine does leave plaintiffs the out of arguing "well we lost, but that case didn't have X, Y, Z and this case does. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 8:52 am
When we think of how our ideal society would behave, does anyone imagine it would include ritual executions? [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 2:37 pm
A Sea of Gray When it comes to plagiarism, one of the most common questions I’m asked is “Is X plagiarism? [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 5:54 am
Beyond that, the paper does not specify rates, instead representing them as X, Y or Z. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 11:44 am
After four years, I’m exploring where does Diva go? [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 11:28 am
Now we get r = 0.683 and p = 3.44 x 10-9 . [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 1:19 pm
Wise.........................................................................A P P E N D I X Valvashko v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:53 pm
Does this juror have preconceptions about any aspect of this case? [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:38 pm
Durst's Adm'x, 35 Tex. 421, 423 (1871); Jim Maddox Props., LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 9:50 pm
I completely agree with this. [read post]
