Search for: "Burden v. Burden"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 30,987
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2020, 8:35 pm
(Subscription required.)BackgroundFiled by Newman Ferrara back in May of 2016 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, the lawsuit, entitled Lennen v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:25 am
Boxer v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:30 am
In Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, the Court of Appeals held that "For the purpose of Retirement and Social Security Law, the applicant bears the burden of establishing that the disability was the result of an accident, which is defined as "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact". [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
Spoliation of evidenceBurke v Queen of Heaven R.C. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 9:24 am
Long. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 5:44 am
In Autocam Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:19 am
In 1977, the Supreme Court said in TWA v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 3:24 am
Zero Transportation, LLC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 11:30 am
In 1997, EFF participated as both plaintiff and co-counsel in ACLU v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 5:40 am
In addition, rejection of the American Pipe rule in these circumstances will result in duplicative, unnecessary litigation and substantial burdens on the judicial system, the NASAA explained. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 7:01 pm
Cir. 1991); Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 4:05 am
The Application (full text) in Southern Baptist Theological Seminary v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 5:30 am
In Elite Auto Body LLC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
The custodian of the records must meet this burden "in more than just a plausible fashion. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 2:51 am
” In U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 3:50 am
Wonderbread 5 v. [read post]
13 May 2025, 5:41 am
But in portions of the amended statute, the language was not clear about the plaintiff's evidentiary burden. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 6:38 am
However, having fought essentially the same undue burden issues before in Idenix v Gilead [2014] EWHC 3916 (Pat), it is unlikely Gilead felt they got two trials for the price of one! [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 7:42 am
Ohio v. [read post]
