Search for: "State v. Davis"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 6,166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2018, 4:08 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 5 October 2018 Nicola Davies J handed down judgment in the case of Piepenbrock v London School of Economics [2018] EWHC 2572 (QB) (heard 16, 17, 20 23, 24 and 27 July 2018). [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) AAA v Associated Newspapers heard 17 to 20, 25 and 26 June 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Desmond v Foreman, heard 2 to 3 July 2012 (Tugendhat J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:29 am
In his judgement Lord Justice Davis stated that the offender's conduct was sustained and persistent, even after receiving cease and desist notices, for a lengthy period of time; Evans also used sophisticated equipment for the purpose [at 19]. [read post]
22 May 2011, 11:45 am
This was stated in the Texas Supreme Court case, Vail v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:52 am
At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Blog, Lisa Soronen remarks that Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:24 pm
Davis, 116 N.J. 341, 361 (1989) (quoting State v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 8:22 pm
Davis). [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 8:15 am
This was stated in the Texas Supreme Court case, Vail v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 9:57 am
Davis v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:09 pm
Wong, and also as stated in Chandi v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 11:57 am
In macabre detail, the Eighth Circuit issued a March 6, 2018 decision in Bucklew v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 6:35 am
This appeal will consider inter alia whether the convictions of Stubbs and Davis for murder and attempted murder were rendered unsafe by (i) the trial Judge’s handling of evidence at trial or (ii) the trial Judge’s directions to the jury. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
See also Roper v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
Although initially regularly consulted by Confederate States President Jefferson Davis, Stephens was soon sidelined due to his policy disagreements with the more nationalistic Davis, and was tasked with diplomatic efforts that attempted to make peace with the Union. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:22 pm
This prescriber testimony was uncontroverted, so the defendant won, despite the state-law presumption.Odom v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:35 pm
Michigan and Davis v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:49 am
Davis v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
In Davies v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 8:02 am
Davis (1965) 62 Cal.2d 791, 80. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 3:50 am
On the record before us, plaintiffs have stated a cause of action for legal malpractice. [read post]
