Search for: "Weeks v. United States"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 19,098
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2020, 12:12 pm
Over the past two weeks, two decisions on SB 35—both decided by the Honorable Helen E. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:03 am
(rescheduled before the November 1, 2019, and November 8, 2019, conferences; relisted after the November 15, 2019, November 22, 2019, December 6, 2019, December 13, 2019, January 10, January 17, January 24, February 21, February 28, March 6, March 20, March 27, April 3, April 17 and April 24 conferences) United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:24 am
The first is McGirt v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
Furthermore, Justice Blackmun’s observation about traditional means was looking back at an era when in most state and federal court, a person found to be minimally qualified, could pretty much say anything regardless of scientific validity. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
Philippine The Press Gazette had an article “Filipino government shuts down major news network during pandemic” United States A Pennsylvania hobby company filed a defamation lawsuit accusing Mattel, Rubik’s Brand, Velcro and four other companies of falsely claiming it sold counterfeit products, causing Amazon.com to remove it from its online platform. [read post]
10 May 2020, 1:41 pm
United States, ––– U.S. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
” United Mine Workers v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:30 am
In State v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:47 am
United States, 54 App. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am
The justices also sent United States v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:19 pm
[Kelly v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:19 am
(HC 2109/20 Ben Meir v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:09 am
E.g., United States House of Representatives v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:58 am
While “the initiation of the attack on the United States Embassy on 4 November 1979… cannot be considered as in itself imputable to the Iranian State[,] … its own conduct was in conflict with its international obligations. [read post]
7 May 2020, 7:13 am
The case is Friends of Danny DeVito et al. v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:00 am
REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS Vote for Stay Tuned with Preet to win a Webby for the best News & Politics podcast series THE Q&A: “Rules of Procedure United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary,” Senate Judiciary Committee Oral Arguments in Judiciary Committee v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm
But in recent weeks, as outside calls for remote voting or a similar solution have grown louder, an expanding number of legislators from both parties have voiced increased public support for some form of remote voting. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser writes that “[n]ext week, the Supreme Court will hear three cases that could upend one of the most basic assumptions that the Court has maintained since the Nixon years — that the president of the United States is not above scrutiny or immune from investigation. [read post]
