Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S."
Results 3941 - 3960
of 6,064
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2012, 2:26 am
Es importante salvar una b o una v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:40 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:24 am
By Cara CooksonState v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:00 am
He subsequently offered extracts from recordings of the interviews for sale to the public and insisted on them being played, in full, to the jury at his trial. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
& C.4th 78, 2004 WL 2579288 (Phila. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:13 am
Coach Services v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:14 am
William C. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:55 am
The ECJ’s rulings in the Productores de Música de España (Promusicae) v Telefónica de España SAU (case 275/06) and LSG-Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung von Leistungsschutzrechten GmbH v Tele2 Telecommunication GmbH (case C-557/07) confirmed the necessity to balance data protection and IPR under the light of the principle of proportionality, but it did not provide any clear guidance as regards the role of intermediaries in the… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:40 am
C. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 7:37 am
The sale of the goods or services that are properly identified by the incorporated trademark does not as a general rule constitute bad faith under the Policy despite owner’s objection. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:24 pm
§ 1125(c). [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:30 am
Power Ventures, Inc., et al., C 08-05780 JW (N.D. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:38 am
Gold’s Gym is not a plaintiff in the case and I’m not so sure Icon’s apprehension of being sued for trademark infringement is reasonable since it did not receive a C&D letter from Relax-a-cizor. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:49 pm
” As a result, he was sentenced to six month in prison (see: R. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 11:32 am
” Ruling on a motion to dismiss, the Court cited the Ninth Circuit’s interpretation of § 1030(a)(5)(C) given in LVRC Holdings LLC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
The noteworthy portions of the decision for purposes of international practice include the following: The Court considered “preliminarily whether the Ordinary Share Purchasers can bring Exchange Act claims at all in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in” Morrison v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 3:11 am
” See West River Bridge v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
Henson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 7:25 pm
C-34, amended by 2010, c. 23, ss. 70-81 [Not in force at date of publication.]; (2) revised Merger Enforcement Guidelines issued by the Competition Bureau on October 6, 2011; (3) summary and analysis of recent case law including the decisions of the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Sun-Rype Products Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
(c) “Primary personal residence” means a dwelling or mobile home, and the land surrounding it, not exceeding one acre, as is reasonably necessary for the use of the dwelling or mobile home, in which the individual and the individual’s household reside. [read post]
